I don’t see refenece in this article or any others, but how did prosecutors get access to SBF’s Signal messages?
Was it simply a court order that he unlock his phone (and agreed), or a codefendant who flipped to the prosecution and handed over the thread?
One of the co-defendends in the group chat starting taking screen shots when the writing was on the wall, I believe that is what I read earlier
The threat model guides say it many times, but its easy to forget, even if signal works perfectly the people your talking to can compromise you… by taking screen shots, using a second phone to take photos of the first phone, hooking up a audio recorder to record voice conversations, etc.
We also saw this behavior in some of the political trials post trump. Signal + screenshots.
Honestly you can just use a modified signal client that doesn’t delete messages. When you send something to someone you need to trust them.
None of the screenshots had self destruct timers, so I’m not sure how they were using signal… kinda looks like signal desktop
more of the screenshots arnt cropped, they do have disappearing message timers, but they are using signal desktop, which doesn’t do local encryption. So those disappearing messages are still on disk floating around…
(Signal desktop AFAIK has a terrible security posture, not secure at all)
Is there a way to clear messages from the disk other than by deleting the Signal Desktop app itself or is that sufficient?
Not really. Once data is written to disk it’s more or less there forever. At least from a risk perspective.
If your disc is encrypted, you can change the disc encryption key, throw away the old key, then it doesn’t matter that the data is there you no longer have the key so the date is lost.
Most people use full disc encryption, and they’re unlikely to want to throw away all of their data just for signal.
Unless you’re using a container to run signal, or a virtual machine, or qubes : with disc encryption, then anything signal writes to the hard disk is more or less there forever from a risk perspective.
Encryption can’t protect you from the counterparty dumping the chat log to the feds for “protection”
