• exododo@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wait untill you find who made lemmy in the first place. But don’t worry, there’s this proud capitalist alternative called reddit.

      • Mewtwo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve been here for over a month, I’m well aware of who the Lemmy dev is.

        Fortunately I also understand how Lemmy and the fediverse works.

        • exododo@lemmy.fmhy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I get you don’t want to engage with tankie propaganda when you open lemmy (fair, me neither), but lemmygrad.ml is already defederated from most instances. I don’t see the problem with lemmy.ml, wich is a general purpose instance run by the dev, with diverse communities and users. Unless you want to boicot the dev, but then why use his software at all? I don’t get it

      • whats_a_refoogee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s irrelevant who made lemmy since it’s an open source project. Both reddit and lemmy are products of capitalist systems.

        It’s also using ActivityPub protocol, which was developed by W3C, a non-profit organization with a CEO, a board of directors and sponsored by large corporations such as Amazon, Google and Microsoft.

    • Candelestine@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      People are allowed to support whatever political causes they wish, so long as they are willing to engage civilly and fairly with other people. This is how the modern world works, with dialogue and debate instead of censorship, cowardly avoidance and control.

      • 73ms@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, people are also absolutely free to choose not to associate with, use services from people whose opinions they find objectionable etc. Nothing wrong with that.

        • Candelestine@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Of course they are. But once they start telling other people what to do, they are doing a different thing from that, are they not?

          • 73ms@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            They’re just expressing an opinion just like the Lemmy devs have. (note: I have not looked into what their views are exactly so I’m not saying parent poster is correct)

            Nobody is being forced to do what they suggest.

              • 73ms@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                At the end of the day it is just an opinion even if it is in the form of a direction because the one giving it has no real influence on or ability to make the readers do it and they know it.

                • irmoz@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Directions don’t only become directions when you have power. They’re just ineffective if you don’t have it. Doesn’t mean you’re not at least trying to control people

                  • 73ms@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    That’s really arguing about insignificant semantics just concerning the form and not the actual implications of the message.

            • Candelestine@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              When that opinion is shutting down dialogue, cowardly avoidance and censorship, it becomes a far dumber opinion than anyone else’s.

              • 73ms@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                1 year ago

                I think there’s absolutely things worth doing boycotts over. I don’t really like to have much to do with anything that is benefiting Russia for example. We can both have our opinions.

                • Candelestine@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I can agree with and support that. I would not extend that boycott to trying to silence other individuals though. I’d prefer to try to convince them.

              • Brandon@iusearchlinux.fyi
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                If all dialogue was in good faith, I would agree. Unfortunately not all discussion exists to obtain new perspectives, but to push harmful agendas. Those dialogues should absolutely be disregarded.

      • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        And Tbh anyone saying anything else is probably just propaganda - Id be willing to bet the biggest racist and biggest tankie would be best friends given the right introduction. Good ol divide and conquer

      • whats_a_refoogee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t believe that you’re consistent on this position.

        I would be incredibly shocked if you had the same stance towards white supremacists, Nazis, or pedophiles that want to remove age of consent.

        If you do, then cheers. You’re practically a unicorn (in the sense that it’s extremely rare). I don’t disagree with that position as long as it’s consistant

        • Candelestine@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I disagree with what you say, but will defend to death your right to say it. If you don’t hear that often, find better friends.

          • irmoz@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s a very naive view, and ignores the existence of legitimately harmful opinions that must be fought

      • Mewtwo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        So we both agree that open dialogue is important and that censorship and control are bad.

        That’s great to hear that you also oppose the Chinese governments complete censorship of the Uyghur genocide. We should have an open dialogue that anyone who supports such authoritarian control should be made known as such.

        • Candelestine@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure, that’s fine and good, dialogue to your hearts content. But don’t think fixing them is our job. Only war could save the Uyghurs, providing it did not go nuclear. And fighting a war against China is dangerous…

          Their entire race is, unfortunately, dead men walking and there’s not a damn thing we can do about it. China simply does not have to listen to our wishes. We need to worry about our people, not policing the rest of the world.