From the article:

"Moving to the Fediverse

This tension between these communities and their host have, again, fueled more interest in the Fediverse as a decentralized refuge. A social network built on an open protocol can afford some host-agnosticism, and allow communities to persist even if individual hosts fail or start to abuse their power. Unfortunately, discussions of Reddit-like fediverse services Lemmy and Kbin on Reddit were colored by paranoia after the company banned users and subreddits related to these projects (reportedly due to “spam”). While these accounts and subreddits have been reinstated, the potential for censorship around such projects has made a Reddit exodus feel more urgently necessary, as we saw last fall when Twitter cracked down on discussions of its Fediverse-alternative, Mastodon."

  • crank@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best most comprehensive article written on this subject. And there is a link to every other article. As usual EFF does their homework and applies their judgement to describe perfectly:

    The heart of this fight is for what Reddit’s CEO calls their “valuable corpus of data,” i.e. the user-made content on the company’s servers, and for who gets live off this digital commons. While Reddit provides essential infrastructural support, these community developers and moderators make the site worth visiting, and any worthwhile content is the fruit of their volunteer labor. It’s this labor and worker solidarity which gives users unique leverage over the platform, in contrast to past backlash to other platforms.

    • ropean@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll soon need to back on some of my optional subscriptions, but the yearly donation to EFF is staying for sure

      • atlasraven31@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        EFF is sometimes on HumbleBundle and people can give to them while getting something too.

    • doctortofu@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Unbridled capitalism is destroying the internet everything it touches.

      When the ONLY motive for doing (or not doing) something is profit, things go to sit sooner or later. The example I often use is that we actually have enough food in the planet to feed everyone. We just throw a large portion of it away or destroy it, because in so many cases food is not made/grown to feed people, but to generate profits… Sad reality of late stage capitalism.

      • deo@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed. A lot of it is due to misplaced or misrepresented priorities. If you don’t account for human and environmental impacts in the proverbial “bottom line”, you’re gonna have a bad time. If we implemented metrics for sustainability and societal improvement as part of the “worth” or “profits” of a company, the world and our future in it may be a little less bleak of a place. Instead, the current system places waaay too much emphasis on short-term goals that are frankly not in line with what I would consider “productivity”.

    • motorwerks@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just the Internet, huh? I think it’s ruining a few things. Especially when it’s coupled w/ the forever growth mentality.

    • InvisibleShoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is but the FOSS community and projects like the Fediverse and increasing decentralization will go a long way to countering monetisation and the capitalist mindset

        • WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          On mastodon search for the account @news@beehaw.org it will be this lemmy sub but in mastodon. Commenting on posts in mastodon will also comment on the lemmy thread.

          • tcm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Can you upvote or downvote posts through Mastodon? Or does that have to be done from a Lemmy instance?

          • zhunk@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hmm. I can see that account, but I don’t see any posts (in the Mastodon app).

            • lindgrenj6@fosstodon.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              it could be that your instance doesn’t have the post (e.g. no one else in the instance is following the account). Fediverse stuff is weird in that regard where it won’t fetch them from the other server either, but they will show up going forward if you follow the account.

              • zhunk@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ah, so when I subscribe and it shows up as “pending”, that’s me trying to connect the two?

                Still learning, thanks for the help.

                • Charlie@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Kinda. You’re server will not back-populate old posts from someone you just followed. However, you should get all future posts.

                  If you find a thread on Lemmy and you want to comment on it in Mastodon, but you can’t find it normally, you can copy the URL to the thread or comment, paste it in Mastodon search, and then it should force-load that post. Then you can reply and comment on it as normal.

        • lindgrenj6@fosstodon.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I assume it’s through activity pub - that’s how pixelfed and mastodon communicate as well.

          What I’m not sure of is if beehaw uses activity pub internally or it’s just there for fediverse integration.

      • 667@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This seriously blows my mind. You’re commenting from Mastodon on a Beehaw thread which I’m reading and replying via Fedia.io. All this interconnection is amazing; it truly embodies the concept of an internet.

        We should remind people that we have zero qualms about email which is essentially a federated service. You can be on Gmail, Yahoo, or Bing and trust that your message will be delivered to where you point it.

        The only difference being that email is pointed to a particular user on a given instance, and here messages are pointed to magazines/communities.

    • pinkydaemon@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I completely agree with this and I think it’s because of the legal issues it avoids. I’m not a lawyer, but if I’m not mistaken, the entire fediverse doesn’t take a hit if a single server is a bad actor. Whereas sites like Reddit and Twitter need to defend themselves based on the content users generate.

    • ampcold@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it is more like the protoweb. How this works is more similar to BBSes, Usenet, IRC networks and the like from 30 years ago. Truly distributed networks with no central controlling mechanism and the systems communicate by simply agreeing on the technical protocol. That was what the internet was designed for i the first place. The last couple of decades where everything has been centralized to a few big megacorps is an abomination.

      • mobyduck648@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Since the fediverse unlike the rest of the web consists mostly of people hostile to aggressive monetisation there’s a built-in limit to how ‘capitalist’ (in the popular sense rather than the technical sense) an instance can be in terms of funding it. Instances will be forced to find alternative ways to pay the bills to the traditional ‘our users are the commodity we sell’ approach of the corporate social media platforms if they want to stick around for the long run which will be a fantastic thing for the web I think.

      • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        “History may not repeat itself, but it certainly rhymes” -Mark Twain

        It definitely feels like a throw back to before we had these massive centralized ‘social networks’.

        Reddit will live on, but I think we’ll see a shift to the fediverse. It’s the best of both worlds. Smaller communities but with that big network feel if you want. Activity pub is great.

    • Stoneykins@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been thinking we call it web4.0 to mess with the cryptobros. Idk if it is an accurate name, but I bet they would hate it.

    • Mkengine@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t know anything about Web3, what do people outside of the fediverse say what Web3 is or should be?

      • Stoneykins@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Web3 was suppose to be this decades revolution of the internet, where everything became interconnected and decentralized and without authority figures or something

        Then cryptocurrency enthusiasts decided blockchain counts as that and starting calling everything related to cryptocurrency and Blockchain web3. So now web3 just means cryptocurrency, but they still act like it is the future of the entire internet. I think it is pretty dumb, who wants finances intrinsically tied to everything they do online?

        • catacomb@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t care if something like Bitcoin is used within the decentralised web. If I want a subscription and no middlemen, it’s easier than posting cash. I don’t really want it as the basis of the platform, though. Those usually end up being solutions chasing problems preventing real adoption. Most people will always use credit cards.

          Almost anything else, apart from a few cryptocurrencies sharing its likeness, are absolute shams. If minting or the network is centralised, you may as well have a handwritten IOU from the conmen. Cryptobros missed the point and started hyping up the equivalent of Visa with a centralised blockchain (i.e. an inefficient database) but no regulations.

          • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not easier than “posting cash.” Crypto is like using tokens at an arcade. I still use money but I have to convert that money into something stupid first. And then worry about my highly volatile leftovers.

            Can we get a c/buttcoin please.

      • Mummelpuffin@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It was always hazy, but the general idea was decentralizing things. Problem is, cryptobros gonna crypto.

      • towerful@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think web3.0 was supposed to live on Blockchains.
        So, fully decentralised.
        I think the partially decentralised format of the fediverse is a more sustainable model

  • Pete Hahnloser@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    This, I did not know:

    Details about Reddit’s API-specific costs were not shared, but it is worth noting that an API request is commonly no more burdensome to a server than an HTML request, i.e. visiting or scraping a web page. Having an API just makes it easier for developers to maintain their automated requests.

    • mizmoose@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, there’s nothing special about an API. It’s just a shortcut for the app to use to get specific info from the server.

      • sydneybrokeit@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even worse, their official app uses the same API – and, by estimates, the Reddit app uses more calls than Apollo does.

        They wanted more per user than they will ever make. A multiple of that, in fact.

        • mizmoose@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yep. This is Huffman having a tantrum because he found out someone is making enough money to live on with their coding, and his company isn’t getting a slice.

          RES is used by some significant percentage of Redditors and they take donations to fund their work. I’m willing to bet they’re next on the chopping block of his tantrum.

          • sydneybrokeit@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            32
            ·
            1 year ago

            To some extent, Reddit does get a slice - in the form of user engagement. User engagement is how they generate ad impressions, even if it’s not from the users on the third party apps.

            They COULD have simply put ads into the API, or made it a requirement. They didn’t.

            Their entire goal is to maximize “value” before their IPO. Control and number inflation. They don’t care about the long term. Spez wants to cash out, and he doesn’t care what it costs the company.

            • mizmoose@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              1 year ago

              They COULD have simply put ads into the API, or made it a requirement. They didn’t.

              OH, THIS THIS A BILLION TIMES THIS.

              They shot themselves in the foot and are now angry about it.

          • ngwoo@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fortunately something like RES doesn’t need Reddit’s blessing to exist. A browser extension that rearranges information the browser has already downloaded (to massively oversimplify what RES is doing) doesn’t need API access.

            They could shut down old reddit but the only reason RES doesn’t support new reddit is that it would require rewriting the whole thing. If that was the only option, someone would eventually do it.

            • the_inebriati@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              RES is hanging onto life with its fingernails - it’s been in maintenance mode for the past 18 months or so with only 2 people actively working on it (at its peak in 2015ish, I think this was closer to 30).

              By their own admission, they wouldn’t be able to survive any major breaking changes.

      • chicagohuman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Significantly so! An HTTP request probably means loading separate JS, CSS, and HTML documents. To say nothing of the weight of the requested page alone.

    • biscuitsofdoom@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Scraping is more burdensome for the platform since that serves up images, JavaScript, and other files required to render a page. Maybe dying I tools can avoid this.

  • Cyder@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sadly, Reddit has likely won the short-term battle. But hopefully, this Blackout raises awareness of the need for alternatives. Whether it be Lemmy/Kbin, some up-and-coming site like Squabbles or Tildes, or something not yet created, the seeds of migration off Reddit have been planted. If Reddit has such apathy for its communities pre-IPO, just imagine how bad it will be post-IPO when they are dealing with Wallstreet directly.

    • DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Reddit is only going to get worst over the next year. I came across this article a couple days ago while searching for early news coverage of the (then planned) blackout:

      Reddit launches new ad products to boost conversions (archive.ph mirror)

      Reddit has launched Contextual Keyword Targeting and Product Ads, to help advertisers reach new and valuable audiences.

      The article reads like an ad, but what I got out of it was Reddit is going to have more tracking and intrusive advertising. Not a good experience.

      • ngwoo@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Hey there! I’m a human, not an ad. Hello fellow human! I see you’re interested in [contextual keyword targeting]. I think you might be {emotion4} to learn about this related thing, [ad for jesus]!

        This’ll be reddit by the end of the year.

          • Ghostalmedia@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not news? IMHO, it’s obviously news. Enough people noticed that Google’s search results were popping the bed that it got picked up by Reuters, NPR, CNN, etc.

            That said, the News mods could’ve merged all these stories into one sticky thread. A lot of other mods did that.

    • girthero@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah a lot of naysayers had me convinced a short protest would do nothing, but you’re right… This is about awareness. I’ve noticed particularly in the last year a downgrade in quality content on reddit and im sure others are noticing. Lemmy might not be ready yet, but it can be with some building inertia and useability improvements.

      • Dan_Rachevaski@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        If they think people will left reddit in droves and reddit will shutdown during the blackout, yeah they are wrong. The blackout is about awareness, and during this short 48 hours, we already discovered swathes upon swathes of reddit alternatives, some are bigger than other, some are livelier than other, all within their communities yet federating each other, far from whateverthefuck spez is doing. And for that, the blackout is successful.

        Lemmy or Kbin might be small, but hey, at least we can quite certain that we are human contributors, not bots.

        • Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just to be the devil’s advocate here. What if Reddit joined the fediverse, what’s stopping them from opening their doors to the increasing fediverse users and use their ads-machine on fediverse?

          • Makiterr@iusearchlinux.fyi
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            use their ads-machine on fediverse

            How would that part work?

            Also, if they did join the fediverse, that would significantly reduce user lock-in to their site - which is why they won’t.

          • crank@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Interesting questions… well they would have to pick a protocol(s) and implement them. They would have to comply with the mechanics and the licenses.

            For example here is the ActivityPub rec. Given how non interested reddit seems to be in developing… anything… that is not directly $$$-oriented it’s hard to imagine them doing all this. But if they for some reason decided to make a take over of the fediverse and put their back into it? It would be a totally different reddit and I can’t imagine it.

  • sdrawk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    How and why did Reddit think copying Twitter’s API pricing mistake was a good idea? And why charge Apollo $20 million?!

    Like that’s just a cricket bat to the face.

    • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Part of me thinks they were planning on using the high rate as a negotiation tactic. Ask for twice what you want, then back down to your actual number.

      Then the Apollo dev “miscommunication” happened and things got ugly. Maybe they’ll still back down, but maybe they’ll die on that hill.

      The other part of me thinks they just want to kill 3p apps and this is the easiest way to do that. Just price them out. They probably had some accountant or MBA crunch numbers on how many people would leave vs how much more revenue driving people to their ad ridden hellscape of an app…and figured it was worth the bad press.

      Hell, they probably saw what Netflix just did with account sharing and were like “they got more subscribers!!!”.

      I think we are witnessing the beginning of the end of Reddit. It will be slow at first then all at once.

    • overlordror@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re betting that the masses are too baked in to care. Reddit’s CEO said it himself, they’re counting on this to blow over. The best message you can send to them is to delete your reddit account and in the box that asks why you’re doing so, tell them you’re leaving for lemmy. Encourage your communities to follow you. This has happened one before with us old-timers who remember the Great Digg Migration. (Interesting internet history read if you have time.)

    • PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Probably analyzed the Twitter population before and after the API change, and it seems Twitter survived, so they wish to replicate this.

      • Spaceman Spiff@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Surviving is a pretty bad metric, especially for social media. Digg “survived”. So did MySpace, Tumblr, and more. It’s too soon to say about Twitter, but their future (in general) doesn’t look very bright. They aren’t going to disappear, but they also aren’t going to be the cultural powerhouse they used to be.

        More importantly, the move needs to be profitable. On the surface, it is- 3rd party app users don’t currently bring in money. Converting any of them at all to paid or ad-viewing users yields a net profit, if you keep a narrow focus.

        Having these users active and engaged on your platform has a value as well, but one that’s really hard to quantify.

    • HotChickenFeet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Because their intent is to force people to use their native applications. They’re intentionally making it difficult/impossible for third party apps to exist. They’re wagering that their clout surpasses the bad-will they’ll get for the crummy move.

      Then they can bombard everyone with “he gets you” ads or whatever the most recent ad garbage is, and get their full revenue.

  • drwilhi@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    “go to war” is a bit extreme, my one small subreddit I set to private, then left as the sole moderator and signed out of reddit. that is not war that is just leaving