Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoThat's not a wand, Harry...slrpnk.netimagemessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1628arrow-down139file-text
arrow-up1589arrow-down1imageThat's not a wand, Harry...slrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square21fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareRisk@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoWho does Harry own? Also, can Dumbledore own slaves if he’s dead?
minus-squareRisk@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoOh yeah. In all fairness, I’m sure Harry would happily let Kreacher be free if he wouldn’t instantly go on snitch on them to Voldie & Co.
minus-squareHardlightCereal@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoSo you’re saying Harry would totally stop owning a person if it didn’t have negative consequences for Harry?
Who does Harry own?
Also, can Dumbledore own slaves if he’s dead?
Harry owns Kreacher
Oh yeah. In all fairness, I’m sure Harry would happily let Kreacher be free if he wouldn’t instantly go on snitch on them to Voldie & Co.
So you’re saying Harry would totally stop owning a person if it didn’t have negative consequences for Harry?