• Kindness@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yay for The Human Calculator Calendar. Boo for not crediting sources. A missed opportunity to replace Jesse’s name with, “Scott.”

    Double boo for not explaining the extra day every year, not to mention leap year. (364 / 28 = 13.)

    Final boo for conflating the real world ~29.5 day imprecise lunar month with the 28 day English common law lunar month.

  • Rediphile@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    See also: Metric time.

    10hrs in a day. 100min in a hour. 100 sec in a min.

    • Kindness@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hmn…

      You’d need to redefine the derived SI Units, or take new measurements for newly derived units. Newtons, joules, pascals, hertz, coulombs, watts, volts, ohms, farads, siemens, webers, teslas, henrys, becquerels, grays, sieverts, and katals.

      Also not to mention motion and heat.

      You could say there’s a large amount of pressure to not change, or that it’s a high “bar”…

      I hope you smiled, because that is one joke I will not be making again.

      • Skates@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You don’t need to redefine any of them if you don’t change the length of a second though, right? Because the SI unit for time is the second?

        As long as you just change the definition for non-SI units, sure kilometers or miles per hour changes, but that’s not SI, so nobody cares.

        • maryjayjay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are (roughly) 86400 seconds in a day. This metric time describes a day with 100000 seconds. If you don’t redefine the second, then I guess we’ll just redefine the day, right?

          • BluesF@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            100 seconds to a minute, 96 minutes to an hour, 9 hours in a day?? Metric with rounding.

    • SrTobi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Though I like the idea a lot, 60 has the great advantage that you can devide it by 2,3,4,5 and 6 which is a very useful property… The real power move would be to use the 60-system for everything… Like the Babylonians did, or so I heared

      • jonsnothere@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah, base 12 number system with the same logic as metric. But it’s probably too late to switch to a different number system.

      • bouh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s useful. But when was the last time you used it? You usually don’t say a twelves or a third or a sixth of an hour, you say 5, 20 or 10 minutes. Half and quarter are available the same in decimal time.

        It’s more a matter of habbit. You know what a second, a minute and an hour are because you had all your life to precisely learn it.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you take rhe same 24 hour day, and convert it to 10 metric hours, or mours, and split that to 100 metric minutes, or cenutes, and then 100 meconds, one cenute is 1.44 minutes, and one mecond is 0.86 seconds. The practical difference would be almost imperceptible. A mour would be significantly longer than an hour, 2.4 times, but you’d have the metric system attour disposal to break it into decimals.

        That’s not to say we should switch, but it wouldn’t be that different.

        • Donkter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I always thought that the argument is that metric time sounds nice but it’s actually worse than traditional time because 24 and 60 have much more factors that are more convenient in every day use. You can split them in half, in quarters, in thirds, in sixths.

          • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You can make that same argument for Imperial units like inches and feet and cups and ounces. That’s why imperial units are still popular, because decimals are great for science and conversions, but 100 doesn’t have many divisors.

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also 10 days in a week. And 3 weeks in a month. Still 12 months, and 5 free days at the end. I like free days.

  • Longpork_afficianado@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck it. No-one is this thread can seem to agree, so I’m making a unilateral declaration that from here on out, all units of time except for the second are abolished, and we just use unix time for everything. You have until 1699217619s to make the switch.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        No. Base 12 and base 60 are significantly better for things that are commonly divided into halves, thirds, fourths and so on.

        A “day” is 86400 seconds. Changing the length of a second is a non starter, so you’d end up saying a day doesn’t line up with a day night cycle, or something weird like “a day is 8.64 hours long”, which doesn’t feel better than 24.

        • There’s absolutely no reason why days couldn’t be divided in 10 hours of 1000 seconds, we’d just need to change the definition of a second. The 24 * 60 system is based on a numbering system of a civilisation that’s long gone and it’s as arbitrary as metric or imperial measurements.

          The problem is that we have a lot of definitions for “events per second” so redefining all those would be very annoying and costly. Then again, most countries switched to metric and did all those things, so it definitely can be done.

          • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            We could change the definition of a second, but we’d be changing the si unit of time to mesh up with things that don’t currently have si equivalents. We’d have to redo a significant number of units.
            The meter is defined in terms of the second, which is then used to define the kilogram.
            It’s a base unit that all the others are built on. This wouldn’t be a tweak, it would be rebuilding the metric system. So that there would be ten hours in a day, which we would keep having to tweak because the earths rotation isn’t constant, which is why “day” isn’t an si unit in the first place.

            Yeah, the civilization that decided they like base 60 is long gone, but the reason they liked it is still relevant, which is why we keep using it. Highly composite numbers are really convenient, and ten is a pretty shitty number beyond being the base we often count in.

        • tufek@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yep, base 10, base 10 everywhere.

          Chad ancestors splited 1 year of 10 months of 3 décades of 10 days of 10 hours of 100 minutes of 100 seconds and so on. With 5 or 6 “sans-culotides” to handle leap years.

          Also each unit of a decade is related to a fixed name: for example, “primedi” (first day of decade) is the 1st, 11th and 21th days of any month, “duodi” 2nd, 12th and 22th, “tridi” 3rd, 13th, 23th and so on until décadi fot 10th,20th and 30th and last day of the décade.

          Jesse would approve that

  • TheWorstMailman@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kodak used to operate on this 13 month calendar. When I asked someone who used to work there, she was shocked that I knew about it and said that it was the best thing about working there. The original plan that this calendar is based on called for a liminal day between years for New Year’s Day with 2 days for leap years

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is a choice between having an extra day in the holiday season and counting up the extra days plus leap days, and inserting an extra week every several years

      Adding the extra day annoys people who value weeks continuing as they have since ancient times

      Using a leap week rule makes the calendar track the seasons a little worse. Solstices and equinoxes will move by about a week over several years

    • Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I work for a company which used to have 13 financial periods. It was great. Then they switched to 12 and we now have a couple of 5 week periods thrown in to balance the year out. I don’t know why they decided that but it’s not as good now.

  • Overzeetop@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Except that a lunar cycle is 29.5 days long.

    The Jews recognized this and their calendar runs akin to it (https://www.timeanddate.com/date/jewish-leap-year.html), but with 7 “leap months” occurring over the course of 19 years. Of course, then they fuck it up with extra or fewer days to keep certain holidays from falling on certain days of the week. You win some, you lose some.

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Octember it will be after October. The names will be just as incorrect as they have been for way too long but if anyone wanted the names and order to correspond to their own meaning it would have been fixed by now.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If we change the number of months, the names of the off-by-two months (September through December) are getting fixed too. It’s better to fix all of the technical debt at the same time.

    • Marin_Rider@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      at the risk of sounding like a weirdo, does anyone else remember a book called the First of Octember? it was written and illustrated as though it was a Dr Suess story, but apparbely it wasnt

  • Monz@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let’s make each month 73 days.

    5 months. We can figure out a season for each one!

    And pay less than half as much rent!