Beyond spez (and the fact that he is a greedy little pig boy), I’m curious about the corporate dynamics that prevent a company like Reddit from being profitable. From an outside perspective, they make hundreds of millions per year via advertising, their product is a relatively simple (compared to industries that need a lot of capital to build their product), and their content is created and moderated for free by users. Could any offer some insights or educated guesses? Additionally, I’m curious how this all ties into the larger culture of Silicon Valley tech companies in the 2010s.

  • ritswd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That is a brilliantly thoughtful take, thanks a lot for taking the time!

    The one thing I would temper, is that we don’t know for sure if there would have been better ways to monetize. I’m hopeful that there have been smart people at Reddit who looked into it and gathered good insights about it; maybe some approaches that feel right to us laymen actually crumble under closer scrutiny, with those insights we don’t have. Maybe there is a different leadership team out there who would have figured it out; but I don’t want to rule out the possibility that there isn’t, and that it just couldn’t get figured out. Maybe Reddit was just a terrible investment that had no way to get anywhere good, and that’s just how it is with startups sometimes.

    • derelict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Having worked at startups, there almost certainly were better ideas floating around that couldn’t get the political capital to get adopted.

      • ritswd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Better ideas, most definitely. But good enough to make Reddit profitable? I guess my point is: it’s very possible that yes, but it’s also very possible that there wasn’t really anything to be found.