• 3 Posts
  • 43 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle
  • Yes, you are right.

    The old stuff, now no longer supported, is:

    • .NET Framework up to and incl version 4.8
    • Runtimes distributed as part of Windows
    • Mono is a Linux Runtime used for compatibility

    The new stuff:

    • .NET Core, up to and incl 3, more recent versions are named .NET from version 5 onwards (to prevent mixing it up with the old Framework)
    • Is completely cross-platform, natively
    • I don’t know about desktop specific graphical stuff but that probably depends on the specific library




  • I have never heard of WattOS but that sounds terrible.

    It seems like antiX is a systemd-free Debian flavor.

    If you want systemd, why not just use Debian? Or, if you are looking for a nice preconfigured DE/WM, any of a number of Debian/Ubuntu derivatives.

    Mint for best out of the box setup, Pop!_OS for tiling, Zorin OS if you’re looking for a funky styling, any of the Ubuntu derivatives for the major DEs: Kubuntu, Xubuntu, etc.







  • F04118F@feddit.nltoLinux@lemmy.mlHow bad is Ubuntu?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Completely off topic, but: I’ve been trying Fedora (KDE spin) for a few months now, and I’m flabbergasted at how unusable the distro version (not the Flatpak) of Firefox is. I think it’s a codec issue as I’ve checked Firefox is running in wayland mode, but:

    • video calls (Zoom, Slack) don’t work.
    • despite installing every codec I could find through Fedy, a package manager for non-free Fedora repos.

    Meanwhile, the Microsoft Edge flatpak works flawlessly.

    Are you using a flatpak browser too? If not, how did you get your browser to work?

    I really like Fedora otherwise: up-to-date kernel and modern (very efficiently stored) packages, but properly tested with major releases, btrfs and systemd by default and commonality with RHEL is useful at work.

    But these codec issues are pushing me back to Arch…


  • F04118F@feddit.nlto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneVegan Rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Yes I thought the same. Except for coconut.

    Coconut “oil” is a fat if you’re using the regular definition of room temperature. It’s solid at room temperature and has high saturated fat content (>90%), even worse than dairy (~60-70%). I know there are some other aspects to it that makes people enthusiastic but I don’t think there is any solid evidence that those aspects compensate the huge amount of saturated fat.

    You should get about 2x more unsaturated than saturated fats. So dairy, pork and coconut fat should not be a large part of the fat in your diet.

    Indeed, olive oil, flaxseed oil, peanut oil, sesame oil and basically every oil except coconut has more unsaturated than saturated fat and will help you balance your fat types.

    Source: am vegan and have family with inherited heart/cholesterol problems. I’ve been reading ingredients and nutritional values on all food packaging for a while now






  • Exactly! If you only have to edit small text files on a server once in a blue moon, nano is much less biomemory-heavy. But if you regularly write docs and code in l vim or neovim, it starts to pay off after a week or two.

    I really enjoyed learning to quickly select and change entire words or lines, doing things like: :%s/replace_this_text/with_that/g Etc. If you enjoy that, you will soon get to a point where you miss the motions in your regular editor and install a vim extension in VS Code and stuff, just before fully switching to neovim



  • F04118F@feddit.nlto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneAntinatalism Rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’m sorry, it seems I misinterpreted your comment by a lot.

    I read about Slavoy Zizek’s philosophy and ideas and in that context, “I would prefer not to” is the ultimate rejection of capitalism and some sort of super-resistance, if I understood correctly.

    I thought you meant to dismiss the whole group of ideas without reading them based on how convinced you are of Zizek’s ideas, and were blaming me for “supporting the system”. That’s why I reacted so aggressively, I’m sorry, that was bullshit.

    P.S. I do tend to get stuck in these rabbit holes of philosophy.


  • F04118F@feddit.nlto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneAntinatalism Rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’m not sure if I should feel sad for you, or envious. To be so certain of your own point of view and take pride in not taking other ideas seriously. It must give some sense of calm but at the same time, you miss out on so much. I won’t ask or recommend you anything though, I read the thing. Enjoy your wall staring. Let’s hope it will make the world a better place.