I defended @beaver@lemmy.ca when a comment of theirs was reported.
I was just given context on this. Looking at their comments in that light, I have decided to ban them from !unpopularopinion@lemmy.world for all their bad faith arguments. Banning people for “bad faith” voting is bullshit. Coming here to defend that horrible action will not be tolerated.
admins of other instances can see who voted, and what they voted. You can easily build a self-hosted copy so you’re an admin, federate with Lemmy.world, and see who is voting on a post/comment.
Mods cannot see who votes on a post/comment, so this is the only way.
This has been reported. I may not agree with all they say, but I do agree on following the rules. This is why I don’t engage with the vegan community.
They send their enforcement squad to all houses involved.
Rule 4: Shitposts and memes are allowed
This post stays up.
The lion, the witch, etc.
That’s Mount Tahoma, in California
Being a mod, I honestly don’t know how to interact with the communities I care about. I’m afraid of saying something that offends, then have people afraid of reporting me to, well, me. This means that I keep tone neutral normally.
I have some great dad jokes, if you want them, though.
I’ll respond to you directly about why you decided to comment a month after my comment. You were given a ban in !news@lemmy.world, for saying “Talk shit get shot.” about someone shooting former U.S. President Trump.
Number 1, that’s a rule violation of the community. Number 2, that’s advocating assassination. Number 3, we are in damage control mode right now, so we are handing out 1-day bans like candy to keep on top of moderation of a thread about one of the biggest political events in many of the reader’s lifetimes.
If you have a problem with that, I really don’t care.
This is a prime example of what the community is about.
With that said, advocating violence (read: not justice) will not be tolerated. Vigilante mindsets will not be allowed.
Really getting tired of removing comments calling for death. Advocate for strict justice, not death itself.
b…bu…bu…but…
that’s just wrinkled blankets and sheets with extra steps
You posted it. Nobody on the internet lies. Ergo, it’s your trash.
“swish”
/s for those that need it
Updated the comment with your recommendation. Yeah. I suck at writing.
As a DevOps Architect, let me make it simple:
With a single front-end, you have a bottleneck. If you have one domain (website) that everybody goes to to get to the front-end, that means that domain is the single point of failure.
In my line of work, we use load balancers and sub-domains to divide the work and provide resilience (High Availability), but at the end of the day, if the DNS for that site goes down, we’re down.
Also, as Jet mentioned, whomever whoever controls the domain (website) controls the content. You can’t have multiple groups controlling a single domain. Whomever buys it controls it. If they don’t like content, they could easily block access to it.
I’m oversimplifying the inner workings, so if you want more details, let me know.
EDIT: subtext called me out on my crap English. Have nobody to blame but myself. English is my first language.
Do you have any of the accounts doing the harassment? If you would, DM me those that you have, and I’ll personally look into it, and reach out to instance admins with my findings.
Post reported for trolling/rage-baiting. Leaving it up for now, but will be watching it.
“Weebles wobble, but they don’t fall down”
So, ADHD in me focused on the pattern, and ignored the first line. Man, I really need to read everything…
I dated a 19-year-old at 25. We’re almost at our 18 year anniversary. The further out you go, the less it matters, and 19 and 25 isn’t bad.
She often states if we met earlier, we would have never dated.
I believe it’s what they learned growing up on YouTube/social media. Demonetization is why content is censored, but when perceived from a child’s eyes, without that context, it can easily be seen as “the norm”.