We’re reaching the point where discussing cost in regard to the energy crisis makes us look like fucking idiots.
Imagine what kids reading the history books are going to think of these discussions.
And 10 years isn’t that long really. If someone said we could use no fossil fuels in energy generation in 10 years time that doesn’t sound long at all.
Tooth fairies are the nicest species in the bone fairy group
Actually the videos get stitched together dynamically.
This is a wild comment. It’s incredibly common and in no way implies neuro divergency.
That is pretty odd tbh.
This is the worst advice possible haha you’ll end up getting arrested.
But that doesn’t have a nice ring to it so…
Centicelsius has a nice ring to it.
LLMs real power isn’t generating fresh content it’s their ability to understand language.
Using one to summarise articles gives incredibly good results.
I use Bing enterprise everyday at work as a programmer. It makes information gathering and learning so much easier.
It’s decent at writing code but that’s not the main selling point in my opinion.
Plus they are general models to show the capabilities. Once the tech is more advanced you can train models for specific purposes.
It seems obvious an AI that can do creative writing and coding wouldn’t be as good at either.
These are generation 0. There’ll be a lot of advances coming.
Also LLMs are a very specific type of machine learning and any advances will help the rest of the field. AI is already widely used in many fields.
If used correctly newer generation AIs could be an absolute game changer In fields like medicine, finances, computing, public transport, customer services etc.
But what they’ll actually be used for is to make more money.
If you take capitalism out of the equation they could be an amazing force for good. But under our current system they won’t.
Some people need to be around others, some people hate it, some people are indifferent. Everyone is different.
I find social interactions very draining. While others find being isolated draining.
I think we are likely in the minority but that doesn’t make us weird. No one is normal.
Speak for yourself /s
I did exactly the same. Even the kids wouldn’t sit on it haha
The point is it’s not just a guess with no evidence which is what they think a theory is.
If they came back with that you try and explain that’s why it’s called a theory and not a fact.
I just say “so is gravity”
The word theory is another one.
In my country you can’t give a bad reference but you can refuse to give one.
If your former employer declined to provide one that’s a pretty big red flag.
Your previous employer is the person most likely to know if you are a good employee tbf.
No I don’t think so. Nuclear is super effective and consistent, especially for large setups.
Using renewables while we get our nuclear up makes complete sense. And subsidising nuclear with renewables after that also makes sense.
But the technology to rely entirely on renewables isn’t really there either.