Having no filtering certainly had its pros and cons, considering how much traumatizing shit google would throw at me as a child lol
It’s possible that this raid was connected to a current police operation to arrest users of a darknet child abuse website.
They rely on donations, that part is correct. Are they in constant financial need so they are forced to ask users so often to donate? No, they are not.
Also keep in mind that while the server and developing costs of Wikipedia are one area of spending, Wikimedia spends money on a host of projects. Some of them you would probably consider more important than others.
Lol thats truly unique
The map certainly isnt perfect. Austria for example should be yellow since we official just celebrate an ominous “state holiday” and nothing else. Which essentially was just a compromise in order to not anger the bourgeoisie back when it was made a holiday.
Women are very nice to see if you have a great time to the bottom
What?
Simply means that those terms/phrases are en vogue right now. Generally spoken generations are usually heavily influenced by the generation before them, popularizing things that someone before came up with
If you want the pictures removed, your girlfriend should file a GDPR deletion request with the website. But coordinate that with the police because the worst thing could be the website deleting it and the police then going “we don’t see what you have described on the website, we can’t do anything”
for me it’s the Linux and Star Trek stuff
The German franchise license holders for Burgerking seem to be some of the worst around…
Austria is literally lumped into “Eastern Europe” on this map lol
It’s not about who you condemn, dude. It’s about what exactly you condemn them about. That really shouldnt be such a complicated concept.
Well if you say there is “a trait in a group of peoples’ character” then you should be called racist. This has nothing to do with being against religions.
The Sauds still havent rebuilt the Hejaz railway, effectively making the Hadj more dangerous than hundred years ago…
The equation by the user is bs.
But these companies do hold people’s data, and it’s a catch 22 situation: in order to protect that, they rely on an invasive system. Providers like Crowdstrike have high-level access to critical infrastructure and critical information. Is the a good thing? Maybe yes, maybe no.
There was a clause in the regulations that led broadcasters to basically be scared of losing their license if they didnt include public-interest content in their programming. Plus news wasnt obligated to make profit by the managers
Yeah this is the most believable conspiracy theory if it wasnt simply one bullet
They are known for making a browser that constantly puts them into a financial deficit. Mozilla is still looking for a way to pay their bills in the long run.
In my case actually Western Europe, but a very specific connection that would either need to go through the alps (which means slow speeds and switching trains a lot) or take a huge detour via Paris.
Top to bottom but with D and E switched