Your description doesn’t match your title or the study at all. This is a terrible YSK. At best it’s a YSK these studies are ongoing.

You’re children would be a statistical anomaly if they avoided rotaviruses entirely, ballpits or not.

Since the late 90s it seems, and in US since 2006 wiki

Let me guess, youre not vaccinated and nor are your kids?

Rotaviruses cannot be killed by normal sanitizing and nearly all children will have it (and developed resistance) by the age of 5. It almost never affects adults.

Might as well not let your kids do anything at that point, ballpits are not better at spreading rotaviruses than anything else. Ballpits are not clean, but the toys, floors and walls at the daycare aren’t either, not as far as rota is concerned at least

Flushable wipes are not flushable! These companies should pay to remove them, it was completely false advertising

People give zero shits who you have as a president and what discrimination you guys support. This election affects everyone, like it did last time.

If you think US foreign policy doesn’t affect the US itself, nobody can help you.

Exactly my point. You didn’t think about Ukraine, so of course you aren’t thinking of what this is going to do to the US when other countries abandon their deals too, and Trump retaliates/ sues.

Youre in for a wild economic ride. I guess americans not understanding this is why he got elected. In a way you deserve this.

This is such a dumb take. Just the fact you didnt mention something as clear as Ukraine’s genocide shows you have no idea what a corrupt idiot can do. He will be manipulated and it’s going to cause irreparable damage to society.

That was the first step to remove the rights federally. And then they can go further and do whatever they want with states.

Yeah this is real funny.

Like whatever the states say is gonna matter. Americans are so… I dont even know what to say anymore lol…

It will still raise eyebrows because that’s not how it’s said. The English language is full of similar spellings that sounds differently and people would raise their eyebrows at you there too. Most languages are like this actually.

This is someone using a tool/service to mass send emails, but never bothered to configure it.

Hey

We are reaching you regarding your <profile experience> . See job

It’s like when you say something is full. Double full doesn’t mean anything, but there’s still a difference between full of marbles and full of sand depending what you’re trying to deduce. There’s functional applications for this comparison. We could theoretically say there’s twice as much sand than marbles in “full” if were interested in “counting”.

The same way we have this idea of full, we have the idea of infinity which can affect certain mathematics. Full doesn’t tell you the size of the container, it’s a concept. A bucket twice as large is still full, so there are different kinds of full like we have different kinds of infinity.

That’s the toolbox fallacy. “If only i had good running shoes I would be motivated to run.”.

1. Youre swapping motivation for anxiety, guilt and frustration. Youre better off paying someone on fiver to shout at you.

2. You won’t survive programming if you can’t get through this part. It doesn’t stop taking effort after you’ve learned the basics.

3. The tutor won’t make it painless, or make it go faster really, and people just end up being agry at the tutor.

You’re much better off joining a community/discord of people learning the same thing, or finding a project/thing you care for, and using common motivational tricks. With youtube/Twitch, it’s easier than ever to find people to help you.

Doesn’t mean it’s worth 30k. There are whiskies just as old and better that aren’t sold at that price.

This item is not sold 30k because its old, or even rare. It’s sold at that price because there’s always a rich sucker who wants something expensive.

Makes sense. So the bike gives kJ in work done with muscles, which I guess is even more confusing

Is that 25% efficient at burning calories to produce force or inefficient at converting food into usable calories?

I meant to say in the spending of our calories through our muscles

It’s a measurement of energy needed. Bodies are going to take different amount of force to move the thing, but it’s also going to take a different amount of time, and impart less inertia, which starts averaging out to the same amount of calories. I bet they also raise the amount of calories shown to account for no process being 100% efficient.

Measuring how we consume our calories is also a bit tricky, the bike tells you the minimum energy you spent moving the wheel. It could be slightly more, but not by much because our bodies are pretty efficient at using stuff to burn into energy. The amount needed to move the bike is about as much as we’ll burn because there isn’t a lot of waste. Of course if you have a condition, or are out of shape this changes and the counter becomes more inaccurate, but in a positive way. (You burned more than the counter said). Some will record your body mass index and other info to try to shift you in the right average.

We still calculate how much calories are in food by burning them and seeing how much energy they emit (heat). It’s not really how we consume calories but very similar. All in all calories aren’t a great way to think about human strength, or exercise

They’re actually still trying to find the curve.

What does this even mean? Brave didnt find something to “subvert the advertising model”, they have a subscription lol. Mozilla is trying to keep its browser free and safe, especially now that it’s losing its billion dollar google funding.