I don’t see any way whatsoever that could mean this project is not viable.

That kid is going to code and open source.

Exactly how it works. Now pound me daddy.

And this is not the first time this has happened… to them.

There’s only one possible explanation.

I agree.

What you are today is not what you’ll be tomorrow. Let yourself be. You don’t owe explanations to anyone about what you like.

La Bala - Juana Fé

Why would I fight the truth?

Pppppp ppppp ppppppppp ppppp pppp?

So, Sam, where are you from?

Totally not intentional.

Sadly, I get that a lot. Even as a child. Now I’m approaching 40 and we’ll, that never changed.

The time seems to be different according to the relationship.

A heads up. Yeah, I can see why that could be necessary.

It’s fascinating to see and understand the unwritten rules, and have them written. Sometimes a rule it’s obvious to some, others like me, find them just weird.

Oh I see, even if chats are organised by person, the conversation has ended (even if improperly) if X time has passed. So people organise mentally the conversations as individual interactions, it is the social component that overrides the digital organisation.

I think I get your point.

Thank you.

But chat are asynchronous, availability is not important

Synchronize what?

Thank you for your input and experience. I’ll go with Debian then. With that I’ll have a project that seems to be fun. How is the latency on Linux?