If literally everyone is forced to vote things actually lean more left. The way you force people to vote though can affected different socioeconomic groups differently so can have a wide range of effects.

I do concede that I am probably not the usual. But it’s probably at least worth a try.

Completely anecdotal but…

I found a lot of happiness in my my hobbies. Rock climbing has been just perfect for me.

I found my wife on tinder, so maybe give that a try.

Oh yeah I forgot the good old adage that everything that can’t be clearly explained must be a God’s work.

Nuerons, and the small electrical signals that pass between them. Also religion and there being a god are two different things. The Bible can be easily disproven just like flat earth.

Rock climb

His believe that science points towards a diety is of conspiracy level bullshit to me sure maybe there is some chance but its not overwhelmingly true. If there is a god it likely does not follow the fables written in any religious text.

It’s an opinion he has based on no or misguided facts just like many conspiracy theories. Yes there is a key difference in that you can disprove that the earth is flat but there are other conspiracies that are not easily disproven similar to how it’s hard to disprove the existence of a god, I put them into the same box, they and I am assuming you don’t put them in the same box. Sure I could have probably made a larger explanation but I was probably busy in the moment or otherwise didn’t feel like it.

Conscience is not limited to Humans, Humans are not special. Why would that ever point to there being a god?

I write my "w"s like “uu”. With curves.

I am by no means disagreeing. I am just saying there is an argument that could be made better. Asking a reason for traveling or verifying passports in absolutely nothing new and makes the point the user is trying to make seem disingenuous to a degree. Also a personal reasoning as to why they would like more privacy in the modern era would make the post much more relatable.

I don’t think you pointed out the reason why you care? Also some of those things are not anything new so are not at all supportive of the point you try to make.

This almost seems like healers would become the main focus of the game. Some might like it some may not. But it would change things. It almost seems like you want healers to be so core that you will basically auto lose a fight due to a lack of revival and sustain. So if your healer gets caught out of position or sniped you just have to back off or otherwise just lose. To me that does not sound like a fun game loop.

A better option would likely to be have a multitude of different style of healers that can fulfill multiple different styles of gameplay. Sure have one that can only heal and not dps and has to be protected by teammates, but also have a healer that can Frontline and half allies when they do melee dmg. Have are healers, have single target healers. Have dot healers, have burst healers.

Did you ever stop and consider things could be different in other time zone completely unrelated to humanity. Consider our non is smaller or farther and we never get solar eclipses. Small detail, humanity still here (with smaller waves).

https://santoriniwinetour.com/why-did-the-ancient-greeks-drink-watered-down-wine/

I guess not explicitly a concentrate but I was trying to allude the fact it was used in a similar way.

“The history of Rome podcast” is literally the name.

Making water into wine was not something all that special, it used to basically be like a concentrate that you would then add to water to consume. Shoutout to the history of Rome podcast. So he could make more and more deluted wine with more water but it wouldn’t become more concentrated.

https://lemmy.world/post/19416727

Woah are you technoreligious? Sure believe what you want and all but that is full tech bro bullshit.

Also on a different not just purely based off of you description doesn’t it seem like being able to just use search engines is easier than figuring out all of these intricacies for most people. If a tool has a high learning curve there is plenty of room for improvement if you don’t plan to use it very frequently. Also every time you get false results consider it equivalent to a major bug does that shed a different light on it for you?

If you got hit by a bus your chance for recovery would be better as a non-smoker than a smoker.

Ah yes the only laptops/desktops that pit alien ware to shame for the price to performance ratio.

Hmm, think I’ll trust the academic article over you.