• 4 Posts
  • 49 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 5th, 2023

help-circle


  • I’m somewhat ashamed to admit it, but back before he did “The Apprentice”, I’ll admit I was somewhat fascinated by Trump as a business “mogul”. I read at least 5 of his books starting with “Art of the Deal”. Here are some highlights I remember:

    • He constantly bragged about deals in which he completely fucked someone over. Not once did he acknowledge it - at all. It’s like it never entered his mind. Or, that the more he fucked someone over, the more proud he was.

    • He bragged about never preparing for speeches. He likes to completely wing it every time - which I guess is obvious.

    • He claimed to never eat lunch. Too busy “making deals” he said.

    • He used to be very good friends with the Clintons. Went to their parties often. Spoke very highly of them.

    • Didn’t mention Jeffrey Epstein at all. You know, like all those pictures of them together might have been a secret?

    • Talked about times when he was flat broke or in the hole and how he needed to fake that he was rich to keep up appearances so people would want to do deals with him. I remember one paragraph where he was walking into a building in NY with Ivanka and pointed out a homeless person and told her “See that man. He has more money than me.”

    Long before he entered politics, based on those books, I knew Donald Trump was a despicable piece of shit.




  • Agree for these reasons:

    • Legally: It’s always been legal (in the US at least) to relay the ideas in a copywrited work. AI might need to get better at providing a bibliography, but that’s likely a courtesy more than a legal requirement.

    • Culturally: Access to knowledge should be free. It’s one of the reasons public libraries exist. If AI can help people gain knowledge more quickly and completely, it’s just the next evolution of the same idea.

    • Also Culturally: Think about what’s out on the internet. Millions of recipes, no doubt copied from someone else, with pages of bullshit about how the author “grew up on a farm that produced Mohitos”. For decades now, “content creators” have gotten paid for millions of low quality bullshit click bait articles. There’s that. Most of the real “knowledge” on the internet is freely accessible technical / product documentation, forum posts like StackOverflow, and scientific studies. All of it is stuff the authors would probably love to have out there and freely accessible. Sure, some accidental copywrite infringement might happen here and there, but I think it’s a tiny problem in relation to the value that AI might bring society.











  • I think they can work, but only when certain pieces are there. The protest must have:

    • A clearly defined goal
    • Existing support somewhere in the government, or a financial incentive for people in the government that oppose you.

    For example, civil rights and women’s right to vote had some governmental support. The protests had well defined goals, and helped raise awareness and support for those people already in government to enact change.

    On the other hand, the 1% protests a few years ago, and more recently, BLM, had ambiguous goals. Without clear goals, no existing government support could be identified. And there was no financial incentive for others to act. The protests raised awareness but ultimately had little real effect unfortunately.

    I do wonder if things have changed though. I think public shaming helped enact some changes in the past, but no one has shame anymore.