Definitely trolling
Definitely trolling
Rape culture
Because someone said bitch and doesn’t follow your orders?
Lol.
But you’re also probably trolling
The communists are policing speech? Who would have guessed
Do you want AI to exclusively be in the hands of big companies and the government?
Do you want the future of technology locked behind pay walls and censored so that you can’t use it to do anything they don’t want you to do?
If you think AI regulation comes in the form of making sure big companies can’t do bad things to you, you haven’t been paying attention.
Big AI regulation fan.
I’d say good riddance but the replacement is worse
They’re doing it in every country really.
Hot take.
Memes are common things that have existed as long as humans have.
Historians of the future will not only understand our memes easily, but because they’re (hopefully) more advanced future humans with better technology and culture they’ll be sharing memes that put ours to shame.
They’re not going to be confused.
They’re going to cringe.
“I’m sorry TSA officer, it’s clearly frozen so I can bring it on the plane”
According to the TSA frozen water is allowed past so long as it is totally frozen and not slushy and has no water at the bottom of the container. Basically make sure it’s really damn cold before you leave and hope it doesn’t melt on you.
Because I browse the root website and don’t pay any attention to the sub communities. Are you wanting to speak exclusively to like minded individuals who never criticize or oppose your thoughts?
People who want to use Facebook can pay, deal with ads, or just not use the site. This isn’t some huge scandal and nothing is really wrong here
Then don’t use it. I don’t use Facebook every day.
Oh my God you have to pay for a service you use?
The scandal! The outrage! The horror!
The communist ones are.
Tankies
It doesn’t really matter whether the original data is present in the model
Yeah it does. One of the arguments people make is that AI models are just a form of compression, and as a result distributing the model is akin to distributing all the component parts. This fact invalidates that argument.
This isn’t a slam dunk argument that there’s nothing wrong with what an AI does even if we grant it is transformative. It may also simply be proving that the copyright law we have fails to protect artists in the new era of AI.
If we change the law to make it illegal it’s illegal.
It is illegal to use copyrighted material period outside of fair use, and this is most certainly not.
Yeah it is. Even assuming fair use applied, fair use is largely a question of how much a work is transformed and (a billion images) -> AI model is just about the most transformative use case out there.
And this assumes this matters when they’re literally not copying the original work (barring over fitting). It’s a public internet download. The “copy” is made by Facebook or whoever you uploaded the image to.
The model doesn’t contain the original artwork or parts of it. Stable diffusion literally has one byte per image of training data.
They use a ton of data as reference points. It’s literally in the name of the technology.
Reference is the wrong word.
They learn the patterns that exist in data and are able to predict future patterns.
They don’t actually reference the source material during generation (barring over itting which can happen and is roughly akin to a human memorizing something and reproducing it).
If humans are just brains why are we smarter than dogs who also have brains?