@PriorProject @PorkrollPosadist

All the examples you provided were infrastructure, not social communities, so I think it’s a poor comparison.

Instead, I’d compare AP federation to _social_ constructs. Communities, clubs, groups of friends. Even larger constructs like cities or nation states.

In _those_ examples it’s clear that limiting association is commonplace and healthy.

I definitely agree that these types of blocking are ineffective and generally do more harm than good, but if governments are going to push for this stuff, it would be good to have a solution that doesn’t harm people’s security and privacy.

@BlameThePeacock

It’s the US republicans who want to do this, not me, I’m just approaching this as an interesting problem.

As for my suggested solution, the only database would be the list of sites with adult content. No new personal data would be stored about individuals.

I’m not suggesting that ISPs implement photo-ID checks, just a login with your ISP username/password (an account you already have).

I don’t think there’s any risk of _any_ of these schemes killing off internet porn.

The current government schemes all rely on porn companies opting in and on the government/ISPs to catalog all porn sites on the internet.

Yeah, it’s quite the rabbit hole.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinality_of_the_continuum

@DidacticDumbass

I think one of the best things about the fediverse is that it allows for a diverse set of paradigms.

A “twitter-like” experience isn’t for everyone and it’s great to have variety. I have friends who mostly use bookwyrm—a fediverse “goodreads” alternative—and it’s awesome that I can still follow and interact with them even though I picked a different fediverse option.

@dylan

It’s definitely a shame that reddit is making these changes. The fall of reddit is going to have pretty negative affect for a lot of people.

I’m no fan of corpo platforms—I’d love more widespread adoption of open protocols and software—but I don’t want _users_ to get hurt by the loss.