This is like #1 reason not to be an alcoholic in the USA. You decide you want to get better and this is the best they can do.

I doubt most people would read it anyway. I only ever read community rules when I make a post. Regardless, it would be nice to have (I guess… since I’ve never posted here and so never read it)

When I was younger, oddly.

If you’re using Jerboa, possibly other apps idk, you can only click on links successfully if they are from the same instance as your own account. There is no way to send links to posts/comments instance-agnostically. You can open the link in a browser and it should take you to the post, where you can figure out what you commented.

Idk I’ve never tried or had the urge to try one. Possible, though.

deleted by creator

java_devs_when_they_see_snake_case

Everyone gets tired of it at a different time. Someone found out about it just now and they are enjoying it just as much as you did the first time.

(this is the second post I see about jeans, I assume I am too “blocking c/*memes” to understand)

Not trying to gotcha you or nothing, but it’s funny, that image being hosted on amazon aws.

Oh my! I thought it was made from some kind of tree sap! Apparently those do exist, but all of the ones you find in stores are platic based!

They always fall back on the position of “well, I developed this shit for free, for your ungrateful ass. So you can build your own fucking GUI.”

But the thing about that is…no. And fuck you.

Okay, but consider this: yes.

haha yeah that sounds stressful!

I commented on it and my comment history shows that as the post title.

It is in the modlog but it was already renamed to

DELETED FOREVER. LOSER

It was kind of like that. They were asking whether copying jpg files and compressing/decompressing them into and out of zips worsened their quality.

I don’t have the post’s text but this was my answer:

As others have pointed out simply copying the file, or compressing it in a zip will never ever change it. It is fundamentally the exact same file. If you load it up in a photo editor (not just viewer), and resave it from there, then it might lose more quality.

Renaming it to png changes essentially nothing about it. Most software will still recognize that it’s a jpg, and open it up as such. If they tried to open it as a png, they would fail. If you load the jpg into a photo editor and save it as png from there then it will actually change formats. But there is no point in doing this. The png’s file size will be much larger, and you can not get any of the quality back that you lost when initially saving it as a jpg.

The post was prior to deletion renamed to:

DELETED FOREVER. LOSER

so that’s cool…

deleted by creator

I hope you find peace in darkness one day, nutsack.

I do not! I’ve edited the title to reduce ambiguity :)

We take those little workers for granted.

deleted by creator