One of the biggest overlooks when it comes to cooking dinners or any involved meal with multiple ingredients is accounting for the calories each ingredient will take. Let’s say you’re cooking pasta and you want to include the sauce, some seasonings, some things to mix with the pasta .etc

You’re done but you won’t know what each bowl of that finished pasta will be like per serving. That’s why you have to take into account, all of the calories of the ingredients. That tablespoon of vegetable oil you use, that’s 100 calories. The sauce you’re gonna use, that’s probably another 100. The pasta, 140 probably. It doesn’t work as if the calories are going to vanish by the time you’re finished cooking said meal. Each bowl you could have, could amount to over 500 at most, but you may not know it and it’s easy to overlook.

That’s why also, it looks like people pack on weight so easily when they’re down to just dinner meals to eat. They pile up fast.

  • cwagner@lemmy.cwagner.me
    31·
    1 year ago

    I checked the study (no, I did not pay 40€, I went to my friend Scius Hubius who already bought it)

    underreporting can be either intentional or unintentional (food being eaten but genuinely forgotten). Intentional underreporting includes both food being eaten but deliberately not reported and food consumption being reduced, often to make reporting easier

    I didn’t read through the whole study but only skimmed it, everything I saw there is people intentionally undereporting, changing patterns to make reporting easier, or forgetting what they ate. Nowhere did I see a mention of “people being really dumb and thinking only part of what they eat is calories and the other part isn’t.”

    So if that’s in there somewhere, I’d really appreciate a citation. I have a very low opinion of humanity, feel free to lower it.