• doomkernel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I still believe the name should be Linux Subsystem for Windows. The other way around sound like Proton

    • phorq@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      That would require Microsoft admitting they come in second.

    • MostlyHarmless@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      It is a subsystem of Windows that Linux runs in. It’s not a subsystem of Linux.

      Windows is the system. It’s the host operating system. It created a subsystem specifically for running a child operating system. In this case, Linux

    • thestereobus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s also usually lawyers that create these names. I worked on databases for IBM Cloud and they were all called “IBM Cloud Databases for Elasticsearch” and what have you. Despite it being an offering of the database on IBM’s cloud.

      Since Elasticsearch is a brand name, the “host” corporation corporation has to present it as a product “for” the brand name rather than as the brand name itself to avoid implying that they are acting AS Linux or Elasticsearch or whoever is the third party.

    • maeries@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It actually makes sense. It’s a subsystem in Windows (therefore a windows subsystem) that makes Linux work

    • intrepid@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      In what world would Microsoft allow the Linux name to appear before Windows? If MS were a person, they would be diagnosed with Narcissistic Personality Disorder.