Python V2/V3??? How old is this thing? Not even Debian comes with Python 2 these days.
Not even Debian comes with Python 2 these days.
It was only removed 9 months ago
OP was technically correct, the best kind of correct.
Through long and weary travels,* I bring the gift of source preserved by the workers of the great archives: https://web.archive.org/web/20140831164530/http://bjorn.tipling.com/if-programming-languages-were-weapons
* (they weren’t that bad honestly, a kind soul that took the journey 9 years ago made mine much shorter)
Thank you! The original source of truth! 💎 As IT people, this is part of our culture and should be transmitted. 🤣
It seems the image is a screenshot of the original page, slightly upscaled, but since the source page includes links to larger images we can make the HD remaster. Shotgun not me.
I feel like python would be an AR-15 or something, generic modern weapon that’s easy to use but doesn’t really do anything special
Definitely better than this outdated version. Nobody uses Python2 unless they want to at this point
Python needs an update:
Python would be a Tavor TS12 automatic shotgun with rotating tube magazines. It’s heavy, doesn’t have a fast fire rate, but it can fire a ridiculous array of ammunition, and they’re working on the ability to fire all the barrels at once (GILess)
They’ve been talking about removing the GIL since I was in primary school. My children are in primary school now. I’ll believe it when I see it.
I believe it was announced that 3.14 will make it an optional flag, so here’s to hoping.
If you write C/C++ libraries for Python you can disable the GIL
There’s now been an investment of dev time from the company formerly known as Facebook to try to push it in 3.12 or 3.14.
Assembly: A gauss rifle, but you have to manually align the magnets
BASIC: 2mm Kolibri
Nim: An AR-15 that you can modify to shoot explosive minigun bullets
Crystal: A halberd with obsidian crystals
Pascal: Trebuchet. A small handful of people know how to make it a truly powerful weapon capable to bringing down any and every opponent.
JavaScript is a foam bat. Easy enough to wield and it’ll get the job done, but very inefficiently and it’ll be an ugly sight…
Definitely ancient since C# has been cross-platform for 4 years with Dotnet Core. If you include Mono, make that 19 years.
still waiting for some of these memes to include haskell…
Haskell is the “words as a weapon”, a heavy book that nobody really understands but is great to thump heads
haskell is an intricately designed laser gun that you cant shoot it without a learning group theory and lambda calculus
Finally, a computer analogy that’s not about cars
Batmobile
Since my father makes anywhere from $400-$1200 an hour coding in COBOL, what’s COBOL?
Secret magic chants of the ancients
A T-Rex. The only people with the know-how to convert everything it does to something more modern are $400-$1200/hour motivated not to.
I learned perl to make IRC bots and to customize bulletin boards in the late 90s, early aughts.
I owe a lot to that language as it impressed a woman with my skills in it. I got my first marriage and eldest son out of it.
deleted by creator
Funny. I learnt perl to make an IRC bot. I didn’t even get a tee shirt, let alone a wife and son
C++ and ruby are weird, especially since C is somehow considered a reliable rifle. Rust betrays it’s age
C is reliable in the sense that your C program reliably has memory leaks and security holes.
Unlike your Java program amirite.
The benefit of java is that you didn’t write the security holes in your software.
Programmers can trust language security features too much…
Of course, they’re nice to have and really can make things easier to implement securely but it’s still very easy to introduce security problems or bugs into any code. This is just an unsolvable problem of writing imperative code. All imperative code will reliably have memory leaks (even in Java!) and security holes because no compiler can check to see if you thought of everything.
And large and complex compilers/interpreters with these security features can end up introducing their own security problems or bugs in the process of implementing them.
I’m just tired of people entirely dismissing languages like C because they don’t have these features. Especially when the operating systems their code runs on and their languages may even be implemented in C!
because no compiler can check to see if you thought of everything.
We can try to get closer to that with better language design. You’ll never get there but I think there are obvious benefits as to why you’d want to do that.
I write way less bugs in Rust than I have in Java or C++, and that’s mostly thanks to the language design.
I’m just tired of people entirely dismissing languages like C because they don’t have these features. Especially when the operating systems their code runs on and their languages may even be implemented in C!
Because that code has been review and re-reviewed and patched by experts in the field for years. You’re not gonna write a backend for an app with short deadlines in C because that would be absolutely fucking insane.
Right tool for the right job. C is a stupid choice for most modern apps but it’s indispensable for embedded stuff
Buffer overflows were last seen on the OWASP top 10 list in 2004. Favoring of anything else over C for most things is a pretty obvious reason why. A language change destroyed an entire class of bugs.
The old joke is that C++ is an octopus made by nailing legs to a dog.
So it should probably be a rifle-chaku made by connecting two Garands with a chain.
C# vs Java is also really weird since C# started out as basically a Java clone.
I watched Jon Gjenset’s stream where he implemented the beginnings of a BitTorrent client in Rust and of the four hours about 25% of it was spent wrestling with quirks in serde and reqwest.
It was pretty discouraging watching a pro have to fight the ecosystem so hard.
How long ago was this? I think the ecosystem got waaay better in the last 1-2 years. 3-4 years ago it was rough but shit still worked with a bit of trouble.
As does C#. The Windows-specific parts are not the parts most developers will use these days.
I took it as the donkey being .NET
C is a knife. The basic thing you can build weapons (programming languages) with.
That hose got me a company and many good jobs, still loving the hose to build.grrwt projects. I love my PHP
Hey now! PHP may be old and a bit clunky, but it gets shit done. I’d say PHP is the Colt repeating rifle, since PHP won the internet and the Colt won the West. Much like the Colt, there are better tools available today, but if you want stuff done reliably and quickly, PHP and the Colt are good choices.
ADA is an F-22 Raptor. Effective and functional, but you can’t have one.
