Most of the functionality is present but many important bits are still being developed.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        android is not the linux phone.

        The chromebook would the desktop linux workstation if that were true.

        Go install blender on a chromebook, i’ll wait.

          • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Bad examples. Just running some program is not an argument. Even Windows can run most Linux programs in WSL, but does not mean it’s Linux.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            cons:

            • has to enable linux containers
            • can’t use native filesystem for emulated applications because it’s a completely different environment
            • potential for performance issues given that it’s literally a non standard environment
            • wastes a bunch of disk space
            • requires an entire secondary system to be maintained and updated

            pros:

            • can technically run linux applications
  • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    One of the real downsides of ARM is, it seems, the relative lack of standardization. An x64 kernel? It’ll run on most anything from the last ten years at least. And as for boot process, it’s probably one of two options (and in many cases one computer can boot either legacy or EFI).

    ARM, on the other hand…my raspberry pi collection does one thing, my Orange Pi does something else, and God help you if you want to try swapping the Orange kernel for the Raspberry (or vice versa)!

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      “So far, Qualcomm has most of the critical functions working inside Linux, specifically version Linux 6.9 that was released not too long ago. These critical functions include UEFI-based boot support along with all the standard bootloaders like Grub and system-d.”

    • zarenki@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      A standard called SystemReady exists. For the systems that actually follow its standards, you can have a single ARM OS installation image that you copy to a USB drive and can then boot through UEFI and run with no problems on an Ampere server, an NXP device, an Nvidia Jetson system, and more.

      Unfortunately it’s a pretty new standard, only since 2020, and Qualcomm in particular is a major holdout who hasn’t been using it.

      Just like x86, you still need the OS to have drivers for the particular device you’re installing on, but this standard at least lets you have a unified image, and many ARM vendors have been getting better about upstreaming open-source drivers in the Linux kernel.

      • Alex@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        If the system is SystemReady then the EFI boot chain is fairly straightforward now. My current workstation just booted off the Debian usb installer like any other pc.